GRAVITATIONAL WAVES REVEALED

By Rodney A. Brooks
author of "Fields of Color: The Theory That Escaped Einstein".

The current discovery of gravitational waves at LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) has captured the mind of the public. It will stand as one of the great accomplishments of experimental physics, along with the famous Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887 which it resembles. In fact by comparing these two experiments, you will see that comprehending gravitational waves is not as difficult as you believe.

Contraction. Michaelson and Morley measured the speed of light at different times as the earth moved around its orbit. To their - and everyone's - surprise, the speed turned out to be continuous, independent of the earth's motion. This breakthrough caused great consternation until George FitzGerald and Hendrick Lorentz came up with the only feasible explanation: objects in motion contract. Einstein then showed that this contraction is a consequence of his Principles of Relativity, but without saying why they contract (other than a need to conform to his Principles). In fact Lorentz had previously provided a partial explanation by showing that motion affects the way the electromagnetic field interacts with charges, causing objects to contract. However it wasn't until Quantum Field Theory came along that a full explanation was found. In QFT, at least in Julian Schwinger's model, everything is made of fields, even space itself, and motion affects the way all fields interact.

Waves. Electromagnetic waves, e.g., radio waves, have long been recognized and accepted as a natural phenomenon of fields. Now in QFT gravity is a field and, just as an oscillating electron in an antenna sends out radio waves, so a large mass moving back and forth will send out gravitational waves. But it didn't take QFT to show this. Einstein also believed that gravity is a field that obeys his equations, just as the EM field adheres to the equations of James Maxwell. In fact gravitational waves have been recognized by many physicists, from Einstein on down, who regard gravity as a field.

Curvature. But what about "curvature of space-time", which many people today say is what causes gravity? You may be shocked to learn that's not how Einstein saw it. He believed that the gravitational field causes things, even space itself, to contract, comparable to the way motion causes contraction. In fact Einstein used this analogy to show the similarity between motion-induced and gravity-induced contraction: they both affect the way fields work together. It is this gravity-induced contraction that is sometimes called "curvature".

Evidence. The first uncovering of gravitational waves was done at LIGO, using an apparatus similar to Michelson's and Morley's. In both experiments the time for light to travel along two perpendicular paths was compared, but because the gravitational field is much weaker than the EM field, the distances in the LIGO apparatus are much greater (miles instead of inches). Another difference is that while Michelson, not knowing about motion-induced contraction, anticipated to see a change (and found none), the LIGO staff used the known gravity-induced contraction to see an alteration when a gravitational wave passed through.

Fields of Color: The theory that escaped Einstein explains Quantum Field Theory to a lay audience, without any mathematics. If you want to learn more about gravitational waves or about how QFT resolves the paradoxes of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, read Chapters 1 and 2, which can be seen free at quantum-field-theory.net.

Learn more here!

Quantum Field Theory-- A Solution to the "Measurement Problem".

Definition of the "Measurement Problem".

A significant question in physics these days is "the measurement problem", additionally known as "collapse of the "wave-function". The problem arose in the early days of Quantum Mechanics due to the probabilistic nature of the equations. Because the QM wave-function explains only probabilities, the outcome of a physical measurement can only be determined as a probability. This obviously brings about the question: When a measurement is made, at exactly what point is the ultimate result "decided upon". Some folks believed that the duty of the observer was critical, and that the "decision" was generated when someone looked. This led Schrödinger to propose his well-known cat experiment to demonstrate how ridiculous such an idea was. It is not typically known, but Einstein also proposed a bomb experiment for the same reason, saying that "a sort of blend of not-yet and already-exploded systems. can not be a real state of affairs, for in reality there is just no intermediary between exploded and not-exploded." At a later time, Einstein remarked, "Does the moon exist only when I look at it?".

The dispute carries on to this day, with several individuals still thinking that Schrödingers cat remains in a superposition of dead and alive until someone looks. However the majority of people believe that the QM wave-function "collapses" at some earlier point, before the uncertainty reaches a macroscopic level-- with the definition of "macroscopic" being the primary question (e.g., GRW theory, Penrose Interpretation, Physics forum). Several individuals take the "many worlds" view, in which there is no "collapse", but a splitting into various worlds which contain all possible histories and futures. There have been a lot of experiments created to address this issue, e.g., "Towards quantum superposition of a mirror".

We will now find that an unequivocal answer to this issue is offered by Quantum Field theory. However since this theory has been neglected or misunderstood by many physicists, we have to initially specify what we suggest by QFT.

Definition of Quantum Field Theory.
The Quantum Field Theory described here in this article is the Schwinger version in which there are absolutely no particles, there are only fields, not the Feynman version which is based on particles. * The 2 versions are mathematically equivalent, but the concepts backing them are quite different, and it is the Feynman version that is chosen by most Quantum Field Theory physicists.

* According to Frank Wilczek, Feynman ultimately changed his mind: "Feynman informed me that when he realized that his theory of photons and electrons is mathematically equivalent to the usual theory, it crushed his deepest hopes ... He gave up when ... he found the fields introduced for convenience, taking on a life of their own.".

In Quantum Field Theory, as we will use the term henceforward, the world is composed of fields and only fields. Fields are defined as properties of space or, to express it in a different way, space is made of fields. The field concept was presented by Michael Faraday in 1845 as an explanation for electric and magnetic forces. However the principle was not easy for folks to accept and so when Maxwell demonstrated that these particular equations forecasted the existence of EM waves, the concept of an ether was presented to carry the waves. Today, however, it is commonly accepted that space can have properties:.

To deny the ether is essentially to believe that empty space has no physical features whatsoever. The key realities of mechanics do not harmonize with this view.-- A. Einstein (R2003, p. 75).

Moreover space-time itself had come to be a dynamical medium-- an ether, if there ever was one.-- F. Wilczek ("The persistence of ether", Physics Today, Jan. 1999, p. 11).

Although the Schrödinger equation is the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation for matter fields, there is a crucial and fundamental distinction between Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Mechanics. One explains the strength of fields at a given point, the other explains the probability that particles could be found at that point, or that a given state exists...

For the rest of the article visit the blog at Fields of Color.

Why is the Speed of Light Constant?

The query "The reason is the speed of light constant?" is typically asked about by individuals attempting to learn physics. Google has 2760 links to that question. However the answer is so easy that a 10-year-old can understand it, that is, if you accept Quantum Field Theory.

Bring the ten-year-old to a lake and drop a rock in the water. Show her that the waves move through the water at a specific velocity, and tell her that this velocity depends solely on the properties of water. You may drop different items at different areas and show her that the waves go at the exact same rate, no matter the size of the object or location of the water.

Then tell her that sound travels through air with a fixed velocity that depends solely on the properties of air. You might wait for a thunderstorm and time the difference in between the lightning and the noise. Inform her that a whisper moves as fast as a scream. I believe a ten-year-old can perceive the concept that water and air have properties that establish the velocity of these waves, even if she does not understand the equations.

Any person who can understand this can then comprehend why the speed of light is constant. You see, in Quantum Field Theory space has properties, exactly as air and water have properties. These properties are known as fields.

As Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek wrote, "One of the most basic results of special relativity, that the speed of light is a limiting velocity for the propagation of any physical influence, makes the field concept almost inevitable.".

When you recognize the concept of fields (which of course is certainly not an easy one), that is really all you have to understand. Light is waves in the electromagnetic field that travel through space (not space-time) at a velocity governed by the properties of space. They abide by fairly basic formulas (not that you have to recognize them), just like sound and water waves follow basic formulas. OK, the Quantum Field Theory equations are a little bit more intricate, but quoting Wilczek again, "The move from a particle description to a field description will be especially fruitful if the fields obey simple equations ... Evidently, Nature has taken the opportunity to keep things relatively simple by using fields.".

Even so this inquiry can have a different meaning: "Why is the speed of light independent of motion?" This fact was first illustrated by the renowned Michelson-Morley experiment, in which light beams were measured as the earth revolved and rotated. The shocking result was actually that the speed of light was precisely the same no matter the earth's movement.

As I wrote in my publication (see quantum-field-theory. net): That the speed of light must be independent of movement was most surprising ... It makes no sense for a light beam - or anything, for that concern - to travel at the exact same speed regardless of the movement of the observer ... except if "something funny" is going on. The "something funny" ended up being much more astonishing than the M-M result itself. Essentially, objects contract when they move! More specifically, they contract in the direction of movement. Think about it. If the path length of Michelson's device in the forward direction contracted by the exact same amount as the extra distance the light beam would certainly have to travel due to motion, the two effects would cancel out. Indeed, this is the only way that Michelson's null result can be illustrated.

However the idea that objects contract when in motion was just as confusing as the Michelson-Morley outcome. Why should this be? Again the explanation is offered by Quantum Field Theory. Quoting once again from my publication:.

We need to recognize that even though the molecular configuration of an object appears to be stationary, the component fields are constantly interacting with one another. The EM field interacts with the matter fields and vice versa, the strong field interacts with the nucleon fields, etc. These interactions are what holds the object together. Now if the object is moving rather fast, this interaction between fields will certainly become more difficult because the fields, on the average, will need to interact through larger distances. Thus the object in motion ought to somehow adjust itself so that the identical interaction between fields can take place. How can it do this? The only way is by decreasing the distance the component fields need to travel. Since the spacing between atoms and molecules, and hence the dimensions of an item, are determined by the nature and arrangement of the force fields that bind them together, the dimensions of an object must therefore be affected by movement.

It is essential to recognize that it is not just Michelson's apparatus that contracted, it is anything and everything in the world, including Michelson himself. Even if the earth's speed and the consequent contraction were a lot greater, we on earth would continue to be ignorant of it. As John Bell discussed a moving observer:.

But will she not see that her meter sticks are contracted when laid out in the [direction of motion] - and even decontract when turned in the [other] direction? No, because the retina of her eye will also be contracted, so that just the same cells receive the image of the meter stick as if both stick and observer were at rest. - J. Bell (B2001, p. 68).

To conclude, for those who wish to comprehend physics, I say use Quantum Field Theory and: WAKE UP AND SMELL THE FIELDS.

Mass in Quantum Field Theory

The tale of exactly how the gravitational field entered into physics and quantum field theory is a remarkable one, entailing apples and moons, predictions and confirmations, problem-plagued expeditions, and the two greatest scientific geniuses of all time. And it might not have happened if not for the Great Plague.  Read more, Fields of Color - The Theory That Escaped Einstein