When Do Fields Collapse?

A notable question in physics now concerns collapse of the "wave-function": When does it occur? There have been many speculations (see, e.g., Ghirardi-- Rimini-- Weber theory, Penrose Interpretation, Physics forum) and experiments (e.g., "Towards quantum superposition of a mirror") about this. The most extreme viewpoint is the belief that Schrödinger's cat is at the same time alive and dead, although Schrödinger proposed this particular thought-experiment (like Einstein's less-well-known bomb experiment) to demonstrate how silly this type of an idea is.

The concern arises because Quantum Mechanics can only calculate probabilities until an observation happens. But Quantum Field Theory, which deals in real field intensities-- not probabilities, delivers a practical indisputable answer. Unfortunately, Quantum Field Theory in its authentic sense of "there are no particles, there are only fields" (Art Hobson, Am. J. Phys. 81, 2013) is ignored or misinterpreted by a large number of physicists. In QFT the "state" of a system is illustrated by the field intensities (technically, their expectation value) at every point. These fields are real properties of space that behave deterministically depending on the field equations-- with one exception.

The exception is field collapse, but in Quantum Field Theory this is an incredibly different thing from "collapse of the wave function" in QM. It is a physical event, not a change in chances. It occurs when a quantum of field, regardless of how spread-out it may be, suddenly deposits its energy into a single atom and vanishes. (There are also other kinds of collapse, such as scattering, coupled collapse, internal change, and so on) Field collapse is not explained by the field equations-- it is an independent event, but just because we don't possess a theory for it doesn't imply it can not take place. The fact that it is non-local bothers some physicists, but this non-locality has been demonstrated in many experiments, and it does not result in any disparities or paradoxes.

So once field collapse happens, the ultimate "decision"-- the climax-- is reached. This is QFT's answer to when does collapse occur: when a quantum of field colapses. In the case of Schrödinger's cat, this is when the radiated quantum (perhaps an electron) is grabbed by an atom in the Geiger counter.

Right before a field quantum finally collapses, it may have interacted or entangled with numerous other atoms along the way. These interactions are described (deterministically) by the field equations. However the quantum can not have indeed collapsed into any of those atoms, because collapse can transpire only once, so whatever you refer to it as-- interaction, entanglement, perturbation, or just "diddling"-- these initial interactions are undoable and do not bring about macroscopic changes. Then, when the last collapse takes place, those atoms become "undiddled" and return to their undisturbed state.

To sum up, in QFT the "decision" is developed when a quantum of field deposits all its energy into an absorbing atom. In addition to replying to this inquiry, QFT additionally explains why time dilates in Special Relativity and settles the wave-particle duality issue of Quantum Mechanics. One can simply wonder the reason that this particular concept hasn't already been embraced and made the grounds for our awareness of nature. I think it is truly time for physicists to WAKE UP AND SMELL THE QUANTUM FIELDS.
Get more info on the Fields of Color Blog!

Book Clarifies Confusing Quantum Field Theory

The following is a current article written about Quantum Field Theory and the book, Fields of Color. The write-up appeared in the Leisure World News on September 4, 2015.

The publication "Fields of Color: The Theory that Escaped Einstein" clarifies the perplexing Quantum Field Theory in order that a layman can understand it. Written by Leisure World resident Rodney Brooks, it features no equations-- in fact, no math-- and it makes use of colors to represent fields, which in themselves are difficult to picture. It demonstrates the field picture of nature resolves the paradoxes of quantum mechanics and relativity that have puzzled so many people. It is original, comprehensive, and entertaining.

Brooks is blown away and pleased with the success of his book, which was released in 2011. He says 6,000 copies have been sold, rare for a self-published book on physics. On top of that, the publication has a 4.4 (out of 5) star rating on Amazon along with greater than 90 reader reviews-- a higher score than Einstein's own book on relativity and above Stephen Hawking's popular book "The Theory of Everything.".

In its essence, quantum field theory (QFT) illustrates a world comprised of fields, not particles (neutrons, electrons, protons) as most physicists believe. Nevertheless the field principle is difficult to grasp. To quote from Chapter 1 of "Fields of Color": "To put it briefly, a field is a property or a condition of space. The field concept was introduced into physics in 1845 by Michael Faraday as an explanation for electric and magnetic forces. However, the idea that fields can exist by themselves as "properties of space" was too much for physicists of the time to accept." (Chapter 1 in its entirety can be read at http://www.quantum-field-theory.net/).

Colors of Fields.
Later on this principle was expanded to other fields. "In Quantum Field Theory the entire fabric of the cosmos is made of fields, and I use (arbitrary) colors to help people visualize them," says Brooks. "If you can picture the sky as blue, you can picture the fields that exist in space. Besides the EM (electromagnetic) field ('green'), there are the strong force field ('purple') that holds protons and neutrons together in the atomic nucleus and the weak force field ('brown') that is responsible for radioactive decay. Gravity is also a field ('blue'), and not 'curvature of space-time' which most people, including me, have trouble visualizing.".

He carries on: "In QFT, space is the same old three-dimensional space that we intuitively believe in, and time is the time that we intuitively believe in. Even matter is made of fields-- in fact two fields. I use yellow for light particles like the electron and red for heavy particles,.

like the proton. But make no mistake, in QFT these 'particles' are not little balls; they are spread-out chunks of field, called quanta. Thus the usual picture of the atom with electrons traveling around the nucleus like little balls, is replaced by a 'yellowness' of the space around the nucleus that represents the electron field.".

Brooks' interest in physics was first kindled when at age 14 he read Arthur Eddington's "The Nature of the Physical World." This publication describes how a table is made of little atoms that consequently can be divided into even tinier objects. "So this is what the world is built of," Brooks thought back then. In college at the University of Florida he majored in math with a minor in physics. He was then drafted into the army for two years.

Quantum Field Theory Answers Problem.
Fast forward to graduate school at Harvard University where Brooks was a National Science Foundation scholar, majoring in physics. During the course of this time, he enrolled in a three-year formal lecture series instructed by Julian Schwinger. The Nobel prize-winning physicist had just completed his reformulation of QFT, so the timing was perfect. "I was surprised that all the paradoxes of relativity and quantum mechanics that had previously perplexed me evaporated or were resolved," Brooks says.

After acquiring his Ph.D. at Harvard under Nobel laureate Norman Ramsey, Brooks worked for 25 years at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Md., in neuroimaging. His first research study was regarding the brand new procedure of Computered Tomography (CT), during which time he devised the approach now known as dual-energy CT. Later, he did research on Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and ultimately in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). All in all, Brooks published 124 peer-reviewed articles.

Once he retired, he and his wife, Karen Brooks, relocated to New Zealand in 2001. That was when he became aware of the prevalent confusion about physics, specifically quantum mechanics and relativity, whilst his cherished QFT that fixes the confusion was disregarded, misunderstood, or neglected.

"Consequently I undertook the mission of illustrating the concepts of quantum field theory to the public," Brooks says.

His book was initially published in New Zealand in 2010, and is presently in its second edition.

In 2012, his grandchildren, who reside in Maryland called out, and he and his wife relocated to Leisure World, where he moves ahead to work on his purpose. Whilst Einstein ultimately came to think that reality must contain fields and fields alone, he preferred there to be a solitary "unified" field that would not merely consist of gravity and electromagnetic forces (the only two forces recognized back then), but would additionally contain matter.

He invested the last 25 years of his life unsuccessfully looking for this unified field theory.

Referring to the particle picture that he espoused, physicist Richard Feynman once said, "The theory ... describes Nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And it agrees fully with experiment. So I hope you can accept Nature as She is-- absurd.".

Brooks, alternatively, concludes his initial chapter by saying, "I hope you can accept Nature as She is: beautiful, consistent and in accord with common sense-- and made of quantized fields.".

Find out more on the Fields of Color Blog.